comscore Asus ordered by Delhi High Court to restrain from selling Zenfone-branded smartphones in India
News

Asus ordered by Delhi High Court to restrain from selling Zenfone-branded smartphones in India

Asus has been order to stop selling Zenfone-branded smartphones and other devices in the country. The order was delivered after Zen Mobile filed a trademark infringement case against the Taiwanese company.

  • Published: June 6, 2019 9:05 AM IST
Asus Zenfone 6 (19)

Asus has emerged as the most direct competitor to Xiaomi in the entry-level and mid-range price segment with its Zenfone series in India. The Taiwanese consumer electronics company has challenged with Xiaomi with devices like the Zenfone Max Pro M1, Zenfone Max Pro M2 and Zenfone Max M2. All these devices with their aggressive price and competitive specifications have sold well for the company. However, that run is now under threat due to a trademark infringement case. The Delhi High Court has issued an order that restrains Asus Technology Pvt Ltd from selling and advertising mobile phones, accessories and any other related products under the ZEN, ZENFONE or similar branding. Also Read - Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 gets third Android 10 beta release

Also Read - Asus commercial PCs launched in India: Check out the new machines

The court order was passed by a single judge bench of Justice Manmohan in a lawsuit files by Telecare Network India Pvt Ltd against Asus Technology Pvt Ltd. The lawsuit alleged that Asus infringed the trademark owned by the company. Telecare Network India Pvt Ltd claims that it is the registered proprietor of the trademarks ZEN and ZENMOBILE under the Trade Marks Act of 1999. According to Bar and Bench, the lawsuit adds that the company has extensively using these trademarks for selling its feature phones, smartphones, tablets and accessories under Zen brand since 2008. Also Read - Asus to launch commercial laptop lineup today: How to watch livestream

The plaintiff claimed that Asus had adopted an identical trademark in the form of ZENFONE for selling its own smartphones, which are allegedly identical to those sold by Telecare Network India Pvt Ltd under its own brand. The lawsuit also argues that since both the brands sell devices under the same price segment, the use of ZENFONE trademark by Asus could cause confusion in the minds of public and consumers could perceive that the two brands are associated. The plaintiff thus argues that Asus adopted “ZEN” brand in India with mala fide intent and take advantage of its “goodwill and reputation”.

Asus informed the court that the Zen branding was spearheaded by Jonney Shih, who the company claims is a believer of the ancient Zen philosophy and use of Zenfone branding is a reflection of his belief. The Taiwanese company also argues that use of ZEN branding was common to trade and should be deemed generic in nature. The company also cites a search report conducted on the Trade Marks Registry website showing that various third-party manufacturers had the mark ZEN registered.

Watch: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro First Look

According to media reports, Asus also argued that there is no scope for confusion or deception regarding the Zen branding. Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi with Advocates Daksh Kumar and Sumit R Sharma, representing Asus, told the court that the Zenfone branding was coupled with its house mark Asus, which identifies the origin of the product. The advocates also contended that the plaintiff was disentitled from claiming exclusivity or monopoly over a part of the label or device under Section 17 (2) of the Act.

After hearing both the parties, the Court said that trademarks and trade names are meant to ensure that people do not get confused about the source of goods and services. It also contented Asus’ argument of the term “Zen” being generic in nature. The Court agreed that Zen word is generic but it cannot be a generic mark with regards to mobile phones. ” a word may be generic qua a specific business or trade or industry but not across the board for all business or trades or industries. Consequently, though ZEN is a generic word qua a school of Buddhism, yet it is not a generic mark with regard to mobile phones and tablets as the said word has no connection or correlation with mobile phones or tablets,” the Court said.

The Court thus observed that the plaintiff was entitled to protection for the trademark even without proof of it having acquired secondary signature. It dismissed the search report showed by Asus saying that mention of the mark in the report does not prove that it is being used by third parties. The Court also added that Asus itself had applied for the trademark ZENFONE and it cannot be “permitted to approbate and reprobate” and was stopped from arguing that the mark is generic or common to trade.

The Court, citing facts shown in the form of evidence, noted that the plaintiff had shown prior use of the mark since 2008 while Asus began selling devices under Zenfone brand only in 2014. The Justice Manmohan concluded that Asus’ adoption of the Zen mark was in bad faith. It further directed Asus to stop selling directly or indirectly, offer or advertise for “mobile phones and/or mobile accessories and/or any other related products or any other goods under the trademark ZEN, ZENFONE and/or any other trademark identical and/or deceptively similar to the trademark ZEN and ZEN Mobile, after eight weeks starting May 28.

“The ASUS legal team is currently working with the Delhi High Court in India to resolve the Zen Mobiles and ZenFone trademark lawsuit. The supply of ASUS smartphones, notebooks and other products, as well as technical support and after-sales service for all ASUS products remain unchanged for all consumers,” the company said in a statement. It needs to be seen whether the verdict by Delhi High Court affects Asus’ plan to launch the Zenfone 6 in the country. The next hearing for the case is scheduled for July 10.

For the latest tech news across the world, latest PC and Mobile games, tips & tricks, top-notch gadget reviews of most exciting releases follow BGR India’s Facebook, Twitter, subscribe our YouTube Channel.
  • Published Date: June 6, 2019 9:05 AM IST


You Might be Interested

Asus ZenFone 6

15999

Android OS, v4.3 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to v4.4.2 (KitKat)
Dual-core 2 GHz
13 MP, 4128 x 3096 pixels, autofocus, LED flash

new arrivals in india

Realme Narzo 20A
Realme Narzo 20A

8,499

Realme Narzo 20
Realme Narzo 20

10,499

Realme Narzo 20 Pro
Realme Narzo 20 Pro

14,999

Oppo F17
Oppo F17

17,990

Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51

24,999

Poco M2
Poco M2

10,999

Oppo F17 Pro
Oppo F17 Pro

22,990

Realme 7 Pro
Realme 7 Pro

19,999

Realme 7
Realme 7

14,999

Xiaomi Redmi 9A
Xiaomi Redmi 9A

6,799

Vivo Y20
Vivo Y20

12,990

Xiaomi Redmi 9
Xiaomi Redmi 9

8,999

Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3

13,999

Motorola Moto G9
Motorola Moto G9

11,499

Realme C15
Realme C15

9,999

Realme C12
Realme C12

8,999

Samsung Galaxy Note 20
Samsung Galaxy Note 20

77,999

Xiaomi Redmi 9 Prime
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Prime

9,999

Oppo Reno4 Pro
Oppo Reno4 Pro

34,990

Samsung Galaxy M01 Core
Samsung Galaxy M01 Core

5,499

Realme 6i
Realme 6i

12,999

Asus Rog Phone 3
Asus Rog Phone 3

49,999

OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord

24,999

Infinix Smart 4 Plus
Infinix Smart 4 Plus

7,999

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9

11,999

Samsung Galaxy M01s
Samsung Galaxy M01s

9,999

Vivo X50 Pro 5G
Vivo X50 Pro 5G

49,990

Vivo X50 5G
Vivo X50 5G

34,990

Realme C11
Realme C11

7,499

Poco M2 Pro
Poco M2 Pro

13,999

Realme X3
Realme X3

24,999

Realme X3 SuperZoom
Realme X3 SuperZoom

27,999

Tecno Spark Power 2
Tecno Spark Power 2

9,999

Oppo A12
Oppo A12

9,990

Oppo A52
Oppo A52

16,990

Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Galaxy A21s

15,999

Oppo Find X2
Oppo Find X2

64,990

Motorola One Fusion Plus
Motorola One Fusion Plus

17,499

Samsung Galaxy A31
Samsung Galaxy A31

20,999

Samsung Galaxy M01
Samsung Galaxy M01

8,999

Samsung Galaxy M11
Samsung Galaxy M11

10,999

Infinix Hot 9 Pro
Infinix Hot 9 Pro

9,999

LG Velvet
LG Velvet

Price Not Available

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

Price Not Available

Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020

42,500

Honor 30 Pro
Honor 30 Pro

Price Not Available

Honor 30
Honor 30

Price Not Available

OnePlus 8
OnePlus 8

44,999

OnePlus 8 Pro
OnePlus 8 Pro

54,999

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro

13,999

Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4

8,999

Samsung Galaxy On Max
Samsung Galaxy On Max

9,775

nubia N2
nubia N2

15,999

Karbonn K9 Kavach 4G
Karbonn K9 Kavach 4G

5,290

Motorola Moto C Plus
Motorola Moto C Plus

6,999

Best Sellers